Git Branching Strategies: Choosing and Applying GitHub Flow vs. Git Flow
Branch strategies address code conflicts and version management issues in multi-person collaboration, enabling more organized teamwork. The mainstream strategies are GitHub Flow and Git Flow. GitHub Flow is minimalist and flexible, with only two branches: `main` (the main branch) and temporary branches (e.g., `feature/xxx`). The process is straightforward: create a temporary branch from `main`, make modifications, and merge back to `main` via a Pull Request (PR), supporting continuous deployment. Its advantages include simplicity, efficiency, and rapid iteration, making it suitable for personal projects or scenarios requiring quick updates. However, it lacks version planning and is unsuitable for complex version management. Git Flow has clear division of labor with five branches: `main`, `develop`, `feature`, `release`, and `hotfix`. The process is strict, with fixed responsibilities for each branch and phases such as development, testing, and release. It excels in standardization, orderliness, and risk control, making it ideal for large teams or long-term maintenance projects. On the downside, it has a high learning curve and slower iteration speed. Selection recommendations: Choose GitHub Flow for small teams and fast-paced projects; select Git Flow for large teams or projects requiring version management. The core is to ensure smooth collaboration without sacrificing efficiency.
Read MoreEssential for Multi - Person Collaboration: Git Branch Management Strategies and Team Collaboration Norms
Git branch management is crucial in multi - person collaboration, as it can avoid code conflicts and chaos. The core is to isolate development tasks, allowing each member to work on independent branches before merging the results. Branch types include the main branch (`main`, stable and deployable), feature branches (`feature/*`), bugfix branches (`bugfix/*`), and hotfix branches (`hotfix/*`). The simplified GitHub Flow strategy is recommended: the main branch should always be clean and usable. Feature branches are developed by pulling from `main`. After completion, they are merged through PR/MR. Once the review is passed, they are merged into `main` and the branches are deleted. For collaboration norms, attention should be paid to: clear branch naming (e.g., `feature/login`), using a conventional commit message format (e.g., `feat: add a new feature`), prohibiting direct commits to the main branch, regularly synchronizing the main branch code during development, and attaching importance to code review. For common problem handling: conflicts should be resolved manually after pulling the main branch, commit messages can be modified using `git commit --amend`, and branches should be deleted promptly after merging. By mastering this specification, the team can collaborate efficiently and avoid chaos.
Read More