Git stash: Scenarios and Operations for Temporarily Saving Uncommitted Code
Git stash is used to temporarily save uncommitted work progress, solving code management issues when switching branches or handling other tasks. Common scenarios include when an urgent repair for an online bug is needed during development, or when temporarily dealing with a simple task, allowing the current modifications to be safely saved. Core operations: Use `git stash save "message"` to save uncommitted changes; use `git stash list` to view the list of saved stashes; use `git stash pop` (restore and delete) or `git stash apply` (restore and keep) to restore the most recent stash; use `git stash drop` to delete a specific stash, and `git stash clear` to delete all stashes. The `-u` parameter can save untracked files. Note: Stash does not save untracked files; for long-term work progress, it is recommended to use `git commit` to avoid relying on stash. Mastering these operations allows flexible management of the development process and ensures code safety.
Read MoreDetailed Explanation of Git Workflow: Complete Process from Feature Branches to Main Branch
Git workflow serves as the "traffic rules" for team collaboration, stipulating code submission, merging, and version management rules to ensure orderly collaboration. A simplified Git Flow strategy is recommended: the main branch (`main`) stores stable deployable code, feature branches (e.g., `feature/xxx`) are developed independently, and merged into the main branch after completion and testing. Essential basic commands include cloning, creating a branch (`git checkout -b`), staging (`git add .`), committing (`git commit`), pulling (`git pull`), merging (`git merge`), and pushing (`git push`). Taking the development of the login feature as an example, the complete workflow steps are: 1. Ensure the main branch (`main`) is up-to-date (`git checkout main` + `git pull`); 2. Create a feature branch (`git checkout -b feature/login`); 3. After development, commit (`git status` + `add` + `commit`); 4. Synchronize with main branch updates (pull main branch and merge); 5. Push the feature branch to the remote; 6. Merge into the main branch (via PR if applicable) and clean up the branch. When conflicts occur, manually edit the conflict file (remove `<<<<<<<`
Read MoreGit Version Control: Why Is Git Considered a Standard Tool for Modern Software Development?
Version control tools such as Git are central to modern software development, addressing issues of code change tracking, collaboration, and rollback. Git has become a standard due to its key advantages: its distributed architecture ensures a complete local repository, enabling most operations to be performed offline and enhancing flexibility; branch functionality supports parallel development, with main and development branches acting like independent drafts that do not interfere with each other; commit snapshots record timestamps of every modification, allowing for easy rollback at any time; and its lightweight, efficient design enables quick operations through differential comparisons, ensuring smooth local performance. Additionally, the mature Git ecosystem features widespread industry adoption, abundant open-source resources, and strong tool compatibility. Mastering Git resolves problems such as collaborative chaos, difficult rollbacks, and inefficient parallel development, making it a "must-have" skill for modern software development.
Read MoreGit Distributed Version Control System: Why is Git More Recommended for Team Collaboration?
In team collaboration, version control is key to resolving code chaos, conflicts, and other issues. As a distributed version control system, Git is more suitable for team collaboration than centralized systems like SVN. Its core advantages include: 1. **Distributed Architecture**: Each team member has a complete local repository, eliminating reliance on a central server. This enables offline work, ensuring flexible development even when the server fails and maintaining collaboration continuity. 2. **Branch Management**: Through branching, teams can develop different features (e.g., login page, homepage) in parallel. Modifications in independent branches do not interfere with each other, and merged into the main branch upon completion, preventing code overwrites. 3. **Commit Records**: Each commit automatically records the author, timestamp, and description, facilitating content tracking and improving efficiency in collaboration communication and problem troubleshooting. 4. **Conflict Resolution**: When multiple users modify the same file, Git automatically detects conflicts and indicates their locations, allowing users to manually select and retain content for intuitive and efficient resolution. 5. **Community and Tool Support**: As a mainstream tool, platforms like GitHub and GitLab offer rich features (code review, automated deployment), with abundant learning resources and easy access to solutions for issues. With its distributed architecture, branch management, and clear record-keeping, Git makes team collaboration safer, more efficient, and controllable, serving as a...
Read MoreEssential for Multi - Person Collaboration: Git Branch Management Strategies and Team Collaboration Norms
Git branch management is crucial in multi - person collaboration, as it can avoid code conflicts and chaos. The core is to isolate development tasks, allowing each member to work on independent branches before merging the results. Branch types include the main branch (`main`, stable and deployable), feature branches (`feature/*`), bugfix branches (`bugfix/*`), and hotfix branches (`hotfix/*`). The simplified GitHub Flow strategy is recommended: the main branch should always be clean and usable. Feature branches are developed by pulling from `main`. After completion, they are merged through PR/MR. Once the review is passed, they are merged into `main` and the branches are deleted. For collaboration norms, attention should be paid to: clear branch naming (e.g., `feature/login`), using a conventional commit message format (e.g., `feat: add a new feature`), prohibiting direct commits to the main branch, regularly synchronizing the main branch code during development, and attaching importance to code review. For common problem handling: conflicts should be resolved manually after pulling the main branch, commit messages can be modified using `git commit --amend`, and branches should be deleted promptly after merging. By mastering this specification, the team can collaborate efficiently and avoid chaos.
Read More